Saturday, July 19, 2014

From a Letter to a Syriac Christian Friend

If Christians in the region had their own political identity apart from the Muslims, I'd support them. But, as it is now, they seem to be shrinking (not having children & leaving) and the Muslims are absorbing the ones that are left.

In the contest between Muslims and Israelis, I support the Israelis. Christians should not be in alliance with the Muslims against the Jews. They should be neutral or in alliance with the Jews to drive the Muslims out. Jesus and the prophets came from the Jews not the Muslims. Mohammed is not a prophet I recognize.

Because the Christians are in the minority they will have to live with whatever regime takes power--or leave. Christians will not be in control any time soon unless many Muslims & many Jews convert to Christianity.

Killing is what happens in war and war is what you have right now. It was inevitable. They should have been allowed to fight it out to a conclusion a long time ago. War is how these things are decided, not ineffective "peace talks" and political solutions no one respects. Generals and armies make the borders, not politicians. They always have.

The people that bleeds, sacrifices, and most importantly--wins--earns the right to make the rules, nobody else. This is the only way peace can be achieved. I'm sorry.

Thursday, July 17, 2014

Sluts and Sissies

Jim writes:
Sluts cause collective externalities far more serious than tobacco smokers. Because of the grave and great externalities produced by sluts, they should be taxed and penalized, like tobacco smokers, only at considerably higher rates, rather than subsidized, and subjected to official shaming and exclusion similar to that applied to tobacco smokers, only more severe.

I comment:

People are offended by the use of the word "slut" because they think it's demeaning to women in general.  They think it's an unjust word because it applies to women only.  They try to discredit the basic assumption behind the word by saying that, "it takes two to make a slut." 

But it takes many more than two to make a slut.  A slut is made by many encounters with many men.

Jim also writes:
For men, there is an equivalent to a girl being easy.  If a man who wants to marry young, reveals that he wants to marry young, no woman will want him.  Women despise men who are eager to have a relationship, even good women despise men who are eager to have a relationship, just as men despise women who are eager to have sex...
...Everyone admires the man who has sex with lots of women, because that is hard, while everyone despises the woman that has sex with lots of men, because that is easy.
The male equivalent of a slut is the emotionally promiscuous man who quickly shares his heart with every girl that comes along, whether he's able to be physically intimate with them or not.  Such men usually don't get any, because they are despised by everyone, including sluts.

Tuesday, July 01, 2014

Is NRx Antichristian?

I thought some statements Zippy Catholic made against the neoreactionaries on a comment thread here could be challenged fairly easily.  His original statements are in bold and are followed by my responses:

1. “[Neoreactionaries] don’t mean someone who is living off of the tattered remains of Christian patrimony while not being a believing Christian.”

[On the contrary:] This is almost exactly what Moldbug thinks; for him, the essential elements of the Puritan patrimony have carried over, except the elements aren’t tattered–they’ve never been stronger.

2. “NRx is so committed to its postmodern nominalism that Christian neoreactionaries literally blaspheme the name of Christ…”

“Christianity” is not the name of Christ. Anyone who is capable of understanding Moldbug knows he uses the term to say he thinks modern day Progressives are intellectual heirs of a specific type of Christian sectarianism.

3. “NRx expects to be able to resist cultural forces better than a millennia old notoriously reactionary institution.”

Similarly, “Christianity” is not the Catholic Church. No one is required to use the term to connote the “true beliefs and correct practices of the Christian faith.” It can be used to refer to the set of communities (either in whole or in part) who claim to follow the precepts of Jesus Christ, a very mixed bag indeed.

Jim would like to bring back the old Anglican system, which he thinks–with a few improvements–would make the most effective safeguard against progressivism, which he clearly understands to be evil. In this, he is not far from the Kingdom of God.

Jim wrongly thinks that biblical fundamentalism is the strength of true Christianity. Again, he is close to the Kingdom here because he senses that plenary inspiration is essential.

What Jim can’t see (because he lacks faith) is that the true Christian Religion, embodied by the Catholic Church will be preserved because of the divine promises and the sacraments. He thinks everything depends on the present [apparent] milquetoast leadership of the church.

It doesn’t. The novus ordo mass, despite its accidental deficiencies is more than enough to overcome the world.

4. “It is not considered acceptable for NRx to be a Christian movement or to develop into a Christian movement.”

It did not begin as a Christian movement. Why don’t we take a look at a list of the essential insights of NRx and then decide whether it’s compatible with the faith or not?

Monday, June 23, 2014

Bentham on Filmer & Locke

In an unpublished manuscript, Jeremy Bentham wrote:

Filmer's origin of government is exemplified everywhere: Locke's scheme of government has not ever, to the knowledge of any body, been exemplified any where. In every family there is government, in every family there is subjection, and subjection of the most absolute kind: the father, sovereign, the mother and the young, subjects. According to Locke's scheme, men knew nothing at all of governments till they met together to make one. Locke has speculated so deeply, and reasoned so ingeniously, as to have forgot that he was not of age when he came into the world...Under the authority of the father, and his assistant and prime-minister the mother, every human creature is enured to subjection, is trained up into a habit of subjection. But, the habit once formed, nothing is easier than to transfer it from one object to another. Without the previous establishment of domestic government, blood only, and probably a long course of it, could have formed political government.[10]

Bentham went on to claim Filmer had failed to prove divine right theory but he had proved "the physical impossibility of the system of absolute equality and independence, by showing that subjection and not independence is the natural state of man".

10. J. C. D. Clark, English Society, 1688-1832. Ideology, social structure and political practice during the ancien regime (Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 75-76.

Source:  Wikipedia

Thursday, September 26, 2013

Progress of the Great Apostasy

1.  Political Goal of the Reformation: Eliminate spiritual authority of the Church over the temporal. On the continent, renegade princes usurp the royal priesthood by means of heretic proxies. In England, the king sets himself over the religious cult.

2.  Political Goal of Puritanism/ Enlightenment-Republicanism/ Communism: Regicide.

3.  Political Goal of Modernism: Replace authority of revelation with authority of reason.

4.  Political Goal of Feminism/ Sexual Revolution: Eliminate authority of fathers & break up the traditional family.

5.  Utimate Goal of Scientific/ Bureaucratic Technicism:  Deface, defile, & destroy the image of God in body & soul of as many human beings as possible.

Monday, January 14, 2013

From the Traditional Catholic Baptismal Rite

Priest.  Dost thou renounce Satan?
Candidate/ Sponsor.  I do renounce him.
V.  And all his works?
R.  I do renounce them.
V.  And all his pomps?
R.  I do renounce them.
V.  Dost thou believe in God, the Father Almighty, creator of heaven and earth?
R.  I do believe.
V.  Dost thou believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord, who was born of the Virgin Mary, was crucified, died, and was buried, rose from the dead, and is now seated at the right hand of the Father?
R.  I do believe.
V.  Dost thou believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints, the remission of sins, the resurrection of the body, and life everlasting?
R.  I do believe.
V.  Wilt thou be baptized?
R.  I will.
V.  I baptize you in the name of the Father + and of the Son + and of the Holy + Spirit.
V.  May the Almighty God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Who hath regenerated thee by water and the Holy Spirit, and who hath given thee the remission of all thy sins, may He Himself + anoint thee with the Chrism of Salvation, in the same Christ Jesus our Lord, unto life eternal. 
R.  Amen. 
V.  Peace be with you. 
R.  And with thy spirit.

The priest takes a white linen cloth -- symbolizing the purity of a soul cleansed from all sin, and a relic of the days when the newly baptized wore white albs for 8 days -- and places it on the head of the candidate.

V.  Receive this white garment, which mayest thou carry without stain before the judgment seat of our Lord Jesus Christ, that thou mayest have life everlasting.

The priest gives the candidate or the sponsor a lighted candle.

V.  Receive this burning light, and keep thy Baptism so as to be without blame: keep the commandments of God, that when the Lord shall come to the nuptials, thou mayest meet Him together with all the Saints in the heavenly court, and mayest have eternal life and live for ever and ever.
V.  N., go in peace and the Lord be with you.  Amen.
R.  Amen.

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Christianity and Liberalism

Christianity teaches that the Devil contrived to draw man into his rebellion against God.  As a result, all man’s relationships were disordered and have been characterized by injustice ever since.  Salvation is obtained, not through human effort or striving, but by submitting to the redemption accomplished by Jesus Christ and offered through the ministry of the Catholic Church.  God created man to live in a certain state, i.e., dedicated holiness, and man must consent to this state in order to be saved.

Liberal progressivism tells a different story.  According to liberal progressivism, man was born entirely free, under no subjection whatsoever, possessing freedoms only and no responsibilities.  The fall of man from his natural condition of liberty occurred by his being enslaved under various limitations he did not devise for himself.  The progressive liberal believes that no law not consented to by the human will can be just.  For the progressive liberal, human consent actually confers justice.  Ergo, God’s arrangement is not sufficient to frame just laws for the creature.   

The salvation offered by liberal progressivism is achieved through rebelling against every limitation imposed upon man:  lawful authority, divine law, natural law, materiality, even being itself.  The transgressive program of iniquity develops.  It takes time for liberal progressivism to fully reveal itself in history.  And whatever liberal progressivism promotes as the new good is considered better by those deceived through its seductive lies.

In attacking his natural limitations, defiant man actually accomplishes the Devil’s purpose, which is to deface and defile God’s creation as much as possible, even to its utter annihilation.  It turns out that Hell and the liberal progressive future are the same place, the same end point.
Read Dr. Bruce Charlton on science.